Subject	You won't be going fast enough to generate enough downforce
Posted by	Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) on April 11, 2006 at 3:26 PM
	This message has been viewed 28 times.
In Reply To	You won't be going fast enough in our car to care posted by Waco300zx on April 11, 2006 at 02:19 PM
Message	to notice the presence or abscence of the spoiler either. Its a completely moot point. Z-Jay Vice President - Edmonton Z Car Club 93 300ZX TT - Stage VI
Follow Ups	Rear spoiler question... - BeegsTT 10:39:22 04/11/06 You'll need to fill the holes in the hatch $ buy an NA CHMSL - Dave N 10:44:49 04/11/06 PS: If you really want to remove weight from the car, then - Dave N 10:50:43 04/11/06 8^) (n/m) - 300zxquire 11:19:26 04/11/06 Re: PS: If you really want to remove weight from the car, then - BeegsTT 11:46:06 04/11/06 Please tell me this question is a joke (n/m) - 300zib(NoVA) 10:45:28 04/11/06 If you are asking if it is functional - then yes. (n/m) - Seafordguy 10:46:13 04/11/06 Ever heard of downforce????? (n/m) - phillyz 10:52:30 04/11/06 Don't forget drag! (n/m) - turtleboy 12:15:44 04/11/06 You won't be going fast enough in our car to care - Waco300zx 14:19:49 04/11/06 You won't be going fast enough to generate enough downforce - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 15:26:44 04/11/06 true... (n/m) - Waco300zx 00:42:42 04/12/06 wingless > * (n/m) - Guapo 10:55:08 04/11/06 he speaks the truth. - bjamin 11:04:34 04/11/06 In boolean logic, * actually denotes "nothing." - Kenny 11:06:28 04/11/06 how about wingless > *.* (n/m) - mousersix (San Antonio) 11:18:53 04/11/06 Same problem. - Kenny 11:31:45 04/11/06 Bah - just another way of saying "NA 2+2 Automatic"* - YugoBernie (NoVA) 11:29:33 04/11/06 Its functional. - pallen 11:00:22 04/11/06 i thought it wasnt fuctional doh! - Z_SaMuRai 11:06:33 04/11/06 AFAIK that is correct, the 94+ is the only functional wing. (n/m) - Zluster(Sir Sam) 11:32:17 04/11/06 That's what I heard about the 94+ wing too - BeegsTT 11:44:57 04/11/06 If you do I'll shoot myself. (n/m) - Waco300zx 14:18:34 04/11/06 AFAIK, you are incorrect. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 11:47:37 04/11/06 AFAIK, you suck at physics. (n/m) - Kenny 11:56:07 04/11/06 looks dysfunctional to me (n/m) - aliaZ 14:09:51 04/11/06 By increasing the low pressure behind the car as it moves - 240Z FeO2 12:59:35 04/11/06 Makes the car - jerdobi (SEA) 17:22:54 04/11/06 The whole car was made by a spoiler? Interesting... (n/m) - pallen 19:20:00 04/11/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.